[Skip to content]

  • A / A / A : Change text size



The Marketer logo
The Chartered Institute of Marketing logo
Search our Site
Search help
The Marketer Magazine current issue cover
Careers and jobs

Check out The Marketer Jobs

Find career advice and the latest marketing jobs using our improved search functions

.
inbox

Ambush marketing

From: Alistair Fox, director, Expertek  

 

Date: May 2011 

 

Subject: Ambush marketing

 The CIM research paper Ambush marketing and the law highlights the changing relationship between public events and their sponsors. There is now an assumption that the sponsor of a public event buys the goodwill in it. While this suits the vested interests in the event, in my view it doesn’t fit with the public “ownership” of events such as the FA Cup, World Cup, and so on.

 

These events are popular because the public feels some ownership. We need to be cautious that commercialising these events does not destroy them.
The situation is further exacerbated by the sponsors having little association with the event or location, as with Coca‑Cola sponsoring the London 2012 Olympics.

 

I applaud the Institute in lobbying on these issues, but promoting in-stadium advertising would be a retrograde step if we are trying to retain any semblance of these being non-commercial events. Sponsorship is not ownership; anything else would be unsporting.

 


 

Comments   

  

Read more readers' e-mails >>>

» Indicates required fields

Make a comment
Your e-mail address will NOT be displayed. It is required in case we have a query on your comment.
Can we display your name? »